I am extremely partial towards simple trading strategies. When the backtesting results on this simple 50 Unit EMA System came in, I could not wait to break down the results.
Simple systems pass my “mother rule.” When I explain these systems to my mother, she understands the logic behind them despite the fact that she has no interest in trading. She understands what I am doing with her money and why it is a good investment.
About The 50 EMA の単位系
Simple moving average systems are user friendly: they are easy to explain, easy to trade, and generally work well when the markets trend.
This system is no different. It uses the 50 unit exponential moving average (EMA) as a signal line. The system works on any time frame. The backtesting results use H1 bars, and our current examples will use daily bars.
取引のルール
行く長いとき:
- 価格の上で交差、 50 unit EMA and opens and closes an entire candle there.
ときに急に行く:
- 価格を切った、 50 unit EMA and opens and closes an entire candle there.
長いときを終了します。:
- Trailing stop is triggered.
- Initial stop is triggered.
短いときを終了します。:
- Trailing stop is triggered.
- Initial stop is triggered.
バックテスト結果
The backtesting results I reviewed for this system were based on GBP/JPY trading one hour bars for the entire year of 2010. For this specific backtest, the trailing stop was set to a value of three units.
The setup triggered 33 total trades over the 1 year backtest period. Of those, 15 勝者だったと 18 敗者. This gives the system a win rate of about 45%.
While this isn’t as good as some of the mean reversion systems we’ve looked at, it doesn’t have the open ended downside that they have, いずれか.
Starting with an initial deposit of $10,000, the system registered $60,621.70 in profitable trades and $34,769.37 in losing trades. Keep in mind that the system made three more losing trades than winning trades, so the profit ratio is actually a little bit better than 2:1. The overall profit factor for all trades was 1.74.
This means that a relative beginner can take this system and start trading it profitably from day one. One of the drawbacks of this system is that it suffered a maximal drawdown of 51.21% due to massive overleverage. 明らかに, nobody should trade at the level of leverage in the real market.
システムの改善
Because this is a trend following system that works best in trending markets, we could improve our edge by making sure that our trades only occur during trending markets. The easiest way to do this is to implement a trend filter.
Since we are using the 50 unit EMA to signal trades, we could use a longer term average like the 200 unit EMA to define the trend direction. その後、, we could program our system to ignore any trade signal that would cause us to take a position that goes against the major trend defined by our 200 unit EMA.
明らかに, markets don’t always trend. Many markets go through periods of sideways action that can last for years. このため, I would want to trade this system across a broad range of markets instead of focusing on one specific market. Adjusting the time frame to daily bars would make the system much easier to follow across dozens of equity, commodity, and forex markets.
取引例
OIL
The daily chart of OIL does a great job of demonstrating both the pros and the cons of this system. Anyone attempting to use this approach trading OIL from the beginning of May through the end of June would have had a very frustrating experience. その時に, OIL was stuck trading in a range between 20 と 23. This would have caused ten different trading signals, none of which would have recorded any significant profit.
6月の終わりに, しかし, the system would have entered a long position after the price broke through the 50 day EMA line. The position would have been established around 22.50 and OIL would run as high as 25.50 by the middle of July. This trade could have cleared 10% even after giving some profit back to a trailing stop, which means it might have been enough to cover all of the bad trades from April through June.
GLD
As an alternative example, GLD has been in a long term downtrend since December of 2012. It has only poked above the 50 day EMA line a few times this year and has yet to open and close an entire candle above the line. It has, しかし, been trading much tighter to its 50 day EMA line recently and appears to be positioning itself for a potential breakout.
If this potential breakout were to happen, we would have no way of knowing whether it was the beginning of a new bull run in GLD, or just the beginning of six months of false signals like we just saw in OIL. It would be the first signal that GLD had encountered in months, しかし, so it would certainly be interesting to see how it played out.
Even if the next few trades on GLD didn’t go well, we would still be way ahead because of the significant profit the system made on the short side over the first half of the year.
Rodolfo 言う
こんにちは, してください。, I would like to know, where we can put the initial stop loss for this system.
アンドリュー ・ セルビー 言う
That depends on your personality and your risk/reward goals.
You might want to start with something basic like a 2-3 ATR trailing stop, but you should be sure to adequately backtest how this might affect the results.
テレンスBrannon 言う
によって “massive overleverage” what quantitatively do you mean? What leverage was used for the backtest?
アンドリュー ・ セルビー 言う
明らかに, 、 50% drawdown would not be acceptable. This would obviously mean we need to cut back on the leverage or position size, which would impact the overall return.
JL 言う
こんにちは, If trade exited thru trailing stop, what is the rule for re-entry ?
アンドリュー ・ セルビー 言う
For this simple example, it would be to wait for the price to wait for the price to break the 50 unit EMA int he opposite direction, signaling another entry.
You could also add stipulation that would signal a re-entry in the same direction, but would want to test how if impacts the strategy.