Instead of trading dozens of different markets, what if a system simply tried to improve the results of buy and hold index fund investors?
That is how Georg Vrba’s Best10 Portfolio Management System works. He uses an algorithm to rank each of the stocks in the S&P 500 weekly, and then invests his funds in the top ten stocks. By segmenting the best performing stocks in the S&P 500, the Best10 System gives its investors exposure to the stocks pushing the index higher, while avoiding the stocks that are weighing the index down.
While Vrba doesn’t disclose his exact ranking algorithm, he does discuss the parameters that it is based on. His system analyzes a stock’s valuation, efficiency, financial strength, short interest, and trend. Using both fundamental and technical information gives a well-rounded view of every stock in the S&P 500. The algorithm factors each of these numbers and produces a ranking for each stock that can be as high as 100.
The system is designed to revalue all 500 stocks weekly. If any stock that is currently held drops below a rank of 97, it is sold and the highest stock that isn’t already owned is purchased, even if that stock has a lower ranking. He does not specify, but I assume that Vrba’s system is always 100% invested.
Backtesting the Best10 System
Vrba provides backtesting information for his system over the period from January 1999 through May 2013. Over that period, the system has posted an annual average return of 35.3% 最大ドローダウンと 64%. While that 64% drawdown is pretty large, keep in mind that this is a long-only system that is always in the market. したがって, it was forced to take a pretty substantial hit in 2008.
During the testing period, the system made 1,609 取引. The win ratio on those trades was just slightly below 2-1, と 1,069 受賞者と 540 敗者. The average return on the winning trades was 8.53%, and the average loss on the losing trades was 8.11%. Despite the fact that its payoff ratio is only slightly better than 1-1, Best10 is profitable because it wins on 66% その取引の.
Looking at the annual returns of the Best10 System and the S&P 500, the Best10 System consistently outperformed the S&P 500. While the S&P 500 posted losses in 2000, 2001, と 2002, the Best10 System logged positive returns in each of those years. The only year that the Best10 System underperformed the S&P 500 was in 2008 when it was down almost 40%, slightly more that the S&P 500’s loss. しかし, で 2009, the Best10 System posted a return of 140% while the S&P 500 was only up a little better than 20%.
It is important to keep in mind that there is a survivorship bias in these results. Backtesting using the stocks that are in the S&P 500 today will produce results that are skewed higher because they don’t include any of the stocks that dissolved during that time. しかし, this is likely a limited issue because the Best10 System only holds the top ten stocks in the S&P 500.
The Best10 Portfolio Management System performs exceptionally well during bull markets. It also seems to give investors a better chance at making money during down years than a basic buy and hold strategy. The fact that the system is always 100% long is the only major drawback, however it is possible that it would have missed the big runs in 2003 と 2009 if it wasn’t 100% 長い.
While this system does have significant drawdown potential, it is an interesting system that could likely improve the results of your parents’ buy and hold index fund approach without overly confusing them. The average investor can understand this system, which makes it an interesting option for a hedge fund. It could also be an interesting option as part of a multi-system strategy.
Improving the Best10 System
Adjusting the Stocks Considered
Vrba has also discussed that he can dramatically improve the results of the Best10 System buy removing underperforming stocks from consideration and adding exceptional stocks that are not in the S&P 500 for consideration. Making these adjustments to the pool of stocks being considered increases the average annual return to just over 50%. It also dramatically increases both the win ratio and payoff ratio. Adjusting the stock universe also opens up the results to greater survivorship bias as well as data snooping bias.
Adding a Cash Component
The biggest weakness I see with this system is that it is forced to hold long positions through bear markets. Perhaps you could reduce the drawdowns during these times by allowing the portfolio to go to cash. その後、, instead of losing less than the S&P 500, the system could go to a cash position and preserve all of its equity. This could be done by implementing a simple rule using a long term moving average to determine the trend of the S&P 500.
Adding a Short Component
This is purely speculation, but I wonder how adding a short component would affect the results. If the system is able to profit from taking long positions in the top 10 S&P 500 株式, how would it perform if it also took short positions in the bottom 10 株式? If it was always long the top 5 stocks and short the bottom 5 株式, how would the results compare? This component might have made the system incredible profits from the short side in 2008.