アルゴリズムと機械の外国為替戦略 | OneStepRemoved

QB プロ更新 9 月 2015

によって 6 コメント

黒に戻る! 月のリターンがあった 1.03%. それは巨大な利得ではないです。, 私は認める, しかし、勝利は勝利.

QB Pro lifetime Oct 2 2015

The lifetime equity for QB Pro

Performance didn’t really go anywhere this month. We floated 2% above and 2% below zero most of the time.

QB Pro Sept 2015 株式

The QB Pro performance for September 2015 のみ

QB Yen came in again at a minor loss -0.61%.

qb yen equity 201509

The performance for QB Yen only, Sept. 2015

I’m a bit disappointed with the QB Yen performance so far. Nothing seems wrong other than bad timing turning it on on my part. It’s still hard to take it on the chin for 5 months running, しかし.

The hedge

I manually hedged the portfolio earlier this month by buying USDCNH in a pullback from of all the chaos. The portfolio took it hard when the yuan was loosened up. I figured that any further volatility would likely stem from USDCNH weakness.

The Chinese are actively intervening in their currency. As we all know from the GBP in the 1990s and the CHF this year, interventions work until they don’t. The main point of concern for me is the rollover cost. It is quite expensive to maintain the position.

The thing that makes me comfortable with that trade is that there is no chance of China miraculously healing. It’s in debt up to its eyeballs – everything from corporates all the way up to regional governments. And while China doesn’t want the yuan to devalue too quickly, the absolute last thing it would want is for the yuan to rise in value.

I cannot conceive of any plausible scenario where China manages to return to the 7-10% annual GDP growth that it experienced for 30 年. Too hot, too fast. If you have a plausible scenario in mind, then write your ideas in the comments section.

Updates to the strategy

I’ve promised many updates to the strategy over the past 6 ヶ月. Jingwei and I have evaluated them all. All of the proposed changes came up far short of my expectations and were thus not implemented in the live account.

I’m working with Jingwei, our actuary, to develop new trading systems. You’re going to learn the newest indicator in a few months.

掲示されます。 OneStepRemoved.com 上 Thursday, 9 月 17, 2015

The changes alluded to in the post are all different from QB Pro. I’ve flogged that strategy about as much as I can.

I feel good about QB Pro long term. Before anything potentially good happens in the account, しかし, I really need the Fed to get off the bench. Raising rates would be good for us because it should kick off a long term USD trend. Another round of QE would be the best thing for the strategy. I personally despise QE and think it’s a bad idea, but it would ignite a massive USD selloff. That’s the kind of market where QB Pro has done extraordinarily well in the past.

Here’s the US dollar index for the past year:

US dollar index 365 日

The US dollar index for the past year.

And for easy comparison, here’s the same QB Pro lifetime equity chart. Notice that performance peaked around mid-March and has been flat ever since.

QB Pro lifetime Oct 2 2015

The lifetime equity for QB Pro

Things should pick back up whenever the dollar picks a direction. I expect that to happen by year’s end. Nobody will believe the Fed if they punt one more time on a rate increase in December.

In the meantime, all of this research has given me the great epiphany that the strategy works best where pairs are trending. The portfolio is being rebalanced this month accordingly.

フリーブローアップ保険?

によって 17 コメント

ホームEURCHFペグハンマーで崩壊不快真実と先週のドラマ: you can lose more in your account than you deposit.

Trading on leverage is inherently dangerous. Although an instant 20% move in a major currency is a once in a lifetime event, it goes to show just how quickly the markets can charge over alleged safety features.

Did placing a stop loss at 1.19 for an open EURCHF trade do any good last week? Not a bit! As soon as the market breached 1.20, it instantly gapped down 10%.

When markets go bidless, it means that there is no liqudity in the market. That’s jargon that means everyone is too scared to do any buying or selling. There literally is no price at the moment where anyone is willing to trade.

It was at 1.20. The next thing you see is 1.08 and the price falling fast.

I was fortunate enough to be awake at 3 午前. when the proverbial cow-pie hit the fan. Although I’m an alogrithmic trader, I confess that my immediate instinct was to hop on the bandwagon and buy!, 購入します。!, BUY! all the Swiss francs that I could handle (when you go short EURCHF, you’re selling euros and buying francs).

The way I coped with the urge was to IM a friend and pass a running commentary on the insanity. Posting on Facebook and Twitter also kept me busy. 基本的には, it was a strategy to keep myself wholly occupied and distracted so that I wouldn’t be tempted to jump in.

I’ve seen mega moves before and, more importantly, I know from experience how badly people can get hurt. My favorite war story from working as a broker was a wealthy client in Kuwait that opened an account with $250,000 the night before NFP. He went long on 100:1 leverage and of course the report was the complete opposite of expectations. The market gapped instantly and before his trade could close, his account balance was -$20,000.

You don’t read stories like this on the forums because… who on earth wants to go advertise their financial destruction on the internet? It’s embarrassing and, if we’re honest with ourselves, that person is probably doing everything humanly possible to not think about their situation.

raised hands

Nobody raised their hand to tell me about catastrophic losses in the CHF

 

Free insurance

The primary reason to trade with 最大レバレッジ is because it’s like free insurance against devastating losses. You never know when a peg will go bust or the next 9/11 is going to happen.

Let’s game this out. You were long USDCHF on Thursday and there was no stop loss in the world that could protect you against an instant 10% ギャップ. Consider two scenarios:

  • You had a $30,000 account balance and were trading an institutional level of leverage like 5:1. That means your position value was 30k * 5 = $150,000. The instant gap created a loss of 10% * $150,000 = $15,000.
  • You had a $3,000 account and were trading the “crazy” leverage of 50:1. The position value was also $150,000 and yields a $15,000 損失.

Now let’s talk about what happens in the real world. In the first sceario, the money is on deposit with the broker and you 100% have lost $15,000. It’s a guaranteed fact and you can safely kiss the money goodbye.

2 番目のシナリオ, you may legally owe the broker $12,000 (3k-15k=-12k). しかし, what is the broker’s likelihood of recovering the money? If you’re in the UK and you trade at Pepperstone in Australia, they’d have to sue you in an Australian court. The attorney’s fees alone would be several thousand dollars. And most convincingly, you probably don’t have any assets that the court could award to the broker.

Even if you are in Australia, think about all the bad PR hitting the forums when the big dog starts suing little retail traders. There’s almost no business-case for pursuing the negative balances of retail forex traders.

You’re going to see a lot of hooplah this week about brokers “forgiving negative balances.” It’s great PR and it’s the best way for them to play it. They know darn well that there’s almost no chance of recovering that money. It’s the best way to turn lemons into lemonade because the brokers lost an epic amount of money.

How to protect yourself

Chris ジマー, the programmer here at OneStepRemoved, sent me this as soon as the day ended.

I was already on board with it but this recent event makes your method of pulling money out of FX accounts look very obvious.

I just checked and the USDCHF dropped over 1600 pips on that bar. That really hits close to home as we could have easily been Long that pair and something tells me any stop would not have been filled.

Trade on leverage and, for goodness sake, withdraw the money at regular intervals. Nobody can take it away if you don’t keep it in their hands.