Algorithmic and Mechanical Forex Strategies | OneStepRemoved

  • Articles
  • Sophisticated Web Sites
  • Automated Trading
  • Testimonials
  • Contact

Comparing Exit Strategies for the Cumulative RSI System

September 19, 2013 by Andrew Selby Leave a Comment

This is the third post in a series covering the work Larry Connors and Cesar Alvarez have done using the 2-period RSI as an entry signal. In the first post, we discussed their evidence that shows how accurate the indicator can be in identifying short term oversold situations. Then, we reviewed how they took that entry signal and built the Cumulative RSI System around it.

In the second post, I noted that Connors and Alvarez had suggested that there were a number of different exit strategies that could be implemented. In a later chapter of their book, Short Term Trading Strategies That Work, they discussed five different types of exits and then provided data from backtesting some of those signals.

exit strategies

Five Different Types of Exit Strategies

Much like using the 2-Period RSI as an oversold indicator, many of these exit strategies go against what has become my natural preference towards long-term trend following strategies. Most long-term trend following strategies look to hold on to positions that are closing up, making new highs, and closing above their moving averages.

It is important to remember that we are looking at these strategies from a very short-term viewpoint. That explains why they can be almost exactly opposite from some of the long-term trend following strategies that I prefer and still be profitable.

Fixed Time Exit Strategies

Fixed Time Exit Strategies are exactly what the name implies. They commit to exiting a position a certain amount of time after the entry. If you recall, the average holding time for a position using the Cumulative RSI Strategy was between three and four days. Based on that, it is reasonable to assume that if a position is going to produce a positive return, it will do so sooner rather than later.

First Up Close Exit Strategies

First Up Close Exit Strategies look to exit a position on the first positive close made after a position is entered. Obviously, this only works when used with a short-term system that is looking to take quick, small profits out of the market with a very high win rate. In those situations, it can be surprisingly profitable.

New High Exit Strategies

New High Exit Strategies exit positions after they close at a new high. As I said, this concept runs counter to the long-term trend following approach, but can be very profitable in short-term situations. These strategies wouldn’t work if you were buying at new highs, but since the Cumulative RSI System looks to enter markets that have become oversold during uptrends, a bounce back up to new highs would represent a profitable situation.

Close Above the Moving Average Exit Strategies

Close Above the Moving Average Exit Strategies provide exit signals when a market closes above a specified moving average. The logic here is very similar to the New High Exit Strategies. When entering a position, an oversold market in a long-term uptrend will likely be below its moving averages, so a bounce back above those moving averages would represent a profitable trade.

2-Period RSI Exit Strategies

This is the exit strategy that was used in backtesting the Cumulative RSI System. It looks to exit a position when the 2-Period RSI closes above a certain number. Connors and Alvarez suggest values of 65, 70, or 75 for this number. The concept behind these strategies is that once the 2-Period RSI value has risen to one of those values, the market is no longer oversold and may actually have become overbought.

Backtesting These Exit Strategies

While they could have simply stopped after identifying all of these different strategies, what I like about Connors and Alarez’s work is that they went a step further and actually tested three of these strategies. In order to do that, they looked at every stock from 1995 through 2007 that traded above its 200-day moving average and had closed at a 10-day low. This provided them with 63,101 entry signals, so this was certainly not a small sample size.

Fixed Time Exit Strategies

On those entry signals, Fixed Time Exit Strategies performed the worst of the three strategies tested. However, they still performed much better than I expected. Exiting after holding for one day produced an average trade return of 0.61%. Increasing the hold time to just three days jumped that return number to 1.76%. Continuing that trend, increasing the hold time to 5 days provided a return of 1.97%, and holding the position for 7 days produced an average return of 2.05%.

Close Above the Moving Average Exit Strategies

While the Fixed Time Exit Strategies produced impressive return numbers, the exit strategies based on moving averages performed even better. Exiting on a close above the 5-day moving average produced an average return of 2.65%. Using the 10-day moving average increased the average return to 2.80%.

2-Period RSI Exit Strategies

Much like we saw with using the 2-Period RSI as an entry signal, the higher RSI values returned more profitable trades on average. Using a 2-Period RSI value of 65 produced an average return of 2.76%. Increasing the RSI value to 70 gave us an average return of 2.83%, and increasing the RSI value even higher to 75 gave us an average return of 2.93%.

Choosing an Exit Strategy

While I was not surprised that the dynamic exit strategies outperformed the Fixed Time Exit Strategies, I was surprised at how well those fixed time strategies performed to begin with. It appears that choosing an exit strategy for your system has more to do with your comfort level with a given strategy than its actual performance.

While using a value of 75 for your 2-Period RSI Exit may return a higher average profit than using a value of 65, if you lose sleep worrying about positions that don’t make it to that higher value then you might be better off using the lower value.

Filed Under: Trading strategy ideas Tagged With: Connors, exit, RSI, system

Developing a System Around an RSI Entry Strategy

September 12, 2013 by Andrew Selby 4 Comments

In chapter nine of their book Short Term Trading Strategies That Work, Larry Connors and Cesar Alvarez refer to Relative Strength Index (RSI) as “The Holy Grail of Indicators.” While I don’t like the implication that there is a “Holy Grail” in trading other than hard work and studying, Connors and Alvarez to provide some interesting research to back up their claim.

Connors and Alvarez Research

The standard period that is commonly used for the RSI indicator is 14, but Connors and Alvarez argue that there is no statistical evidence that 14 is the optimal period. Their testing has revealed that a period of 2 will provide the best returns.

Connors and Alvarez set out to test their theory over the time period from January 1, 1995 through December 31, 2007. During this time, they calculated that the average stock that was above its 200 day simple moving average (SMA) gained 0.05% over a 1-day period, 0.1% over a 2-day period, and 0.25% over a 3 day period. They used these numbers as a benchmark for their 2-period RSI indicator to compete against.

Focusing on the oversold side, stocks that had an RSI below 10 were able to outperform each of the three benchmarks. They recorded returns of 0.13% over a 1-day period, 0.31% over a 2-day period, and 0.74% over a 1-week period.

Not surprisingly, when they lowered the oversold requirement to an RSI below 5, the performance numbers improved even more. The numbers then improved again when they lowered the RSI requirement to 2, and once again when they lowered the RSI requirement to 1.

When the RSI requirement was lowered all the way down to one, the RSI indicator recorded returns of 0.3% for a 1-day period, 0.66% for a 2-day period, and 1.18% for a 1-week period. This indicates that the lower the RSI, the more the stock was likely to rebound. Clearly, the 2 period RSI indicator can perform extremely well on short term trades.

My Initial Resistance To Oversold Indicators

My early stock market training was a combination of William O’Neil’s CANSLIM method and the trend following approach promoted by Michael Covel. Because of that, I have always been against the concept of an overbought or oversold indicator. Following with my trend following and CANSLIM training, I believe that the stocks with the strongest relative strength are most likely to continue moving higher.

What I was missing, was the idea that short term overbought and oversold conditions can exist within long term trends. That means that overbought/oversold indicators and trend following philosophies do not necessarily have to be mutually exclusive.

Current Examples

One interesting example of using RSI to identify short-term oversold opportunities would be Take Two Interactive Software (TTWO), which took a big hit in today’s trading. My CANSLIM and Trend Following background tells me to avoid stocks that are taking big hits and crashing below their 50-day moving average on big volume, but that is a longer-term outlook. It would not be unreasonable for TTWO to bounce back over the next few days and then head further south.

RSI Entry on TTWO

TTWO shows a good chance of correcting upward over the next few days

The same case can be made for Webster Financial Corp (WBS) , which has recently lost its 50-day line and has been trending down for the past few weeks. While taking a long term position in this stock might not make much sense to a mid- or long-term trend follower, the stock’s 2-period RSI of 4.23 indicates that it is likely to see a small bounce over the next few days.

RSI Entry WBS

The RSI entry rules show that WBS is due for a correction in the short term.

Systematizing This Concept

It is important to keep in mind that the profitable returns that Connors and Alvarez were able to produce in their returns came from including EVERY instance of a stock falling into oversold territory. They were not picking and choosing their favorite companies.

Therefore, in order for us to use this idea, we will have to build it into a system that will be able to trade every signal generated, not just the ones we like best. This will ensure that we don’t allow our own personal biases to interfere with the system’s success.

It is also important to realize that this 2-period RSI concept is simply an entry signal. In order to develop it into a trading system, we will need to add an exit signals, position sizing, and risk management. This will require extensive testing and analysis, but it does appear that it would be possible to build a profitable short-term trading system using the 2-period RSI as an entry signal.

Filed Under: Trading strategy ideas Tagged With: Connors, entry signal, RSI, stock, trading system

FREE trading strategies by email

Trending

Sorry. No data so far.

Archives

  • Dominari
  • How does the forex market work?
  • Indicators
  • MetaTrader Tips
  • MQL (for nerds)
  • NinjaTrader Tips
  • Pilum
  • QB Pro
  • Stop losing money
  • Test your concepts historically
  • Trading strategy ideas
  • Uncategorized
  • What's happening in the current markets?

Translation


Free Trading Strategies

Privacy PolicyRisk Disclosure

Copyright © 2023 OneStepRemoved.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.